NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:03:50 +0100
Reply-To:
matthew shears <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: *Important* NCSG 2016 Annual Elections - voting has started
From:
matthew shears <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
Hi Tapani

Are you saying that not ticking a box is registered somewhere as a vote 
of ambivalence or opposition?  If that is the case how is that measured 
against the ticks?  If not then what is the point when you only have one 
candidate for a slot?

Thanks.

Matthew


On 22/08/2016 10:58, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:50:12AM +0200, Tatiana Tropina ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
>> I agree with James,
>> For example (I am just talking theoretically) one can't vote for 2 of three
>> candidates + NOTA, because NOTA would mean that no candidate is selected.
> You can vote just two of the candidates just fine.
>
> The system does not force you to choose three candidates: just choose
> two and leave the third as well as NotA unselected.
>

-- 
--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987

ATOM RSS1 RSS2