LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:16:12 +0300
Content-Disposition:	inline
Reply-To:	Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Voting rules & NotA significance
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:	<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:	Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (18 lines)

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:53:22AM +0000, James Gannon ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> As per the EC meeting yesterday does this constitute the
> instructions to be sent to the list and if so has this been approved
> by the EC as the formal communication?

No, this is my explanation of the effect of the approved rules.

Any formal communication from the EC may choose to do will be clearly
indicated as such.

As for the meeting yesterday, discussion aside the only actual
decision formally made was the treatment of NotA in the ballot, and it
was quite clear.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU