Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:00:09 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Totally agree with Amr.
Stephanie
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.
Original Message
From: Amr Elsadr
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Reply To: Amr Elsadr
Subject: Re: Intercessional Planning
Hi,
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Group CEO-Vaibhav Aggarwal <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, it is the decision of the EC especially the Chair on this. I must point out that The tone and Tanner used (James) is not right.
I don’t agree, and see nothing wrong with the “tone and Tanner” used by James.
> The whole idea of the EC is to vest trust in them to taken decisions for the rest of the members.
I disagree again. All EC members are accountable to the NCSG members in both their decisions and processes used to make them. NCSG members have an obligation to raise questions and/or concerns when they have them.
> Appologies in advance if I am being direct.
Speaking for myself, no apologies needed. I appreciate directness. Spares me the trouble of having to second-guess what someone is saying. :)
Thanks.
Amr
|
|
|