NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kathy Kleiman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:16:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I would like to talk with them about work flow. ICANN has hired 100 
policy staffers in the last year and has an enormous new capability for 
work flow, but we do not. There is no way to keep up with what is "in 
the queue" and "coming down the pike."

I would expressly invite David Olive (as lead of ICANN's Policy 
Development Support Team) to be part of this discussion as well. How do 
we make the work load reasonable if we want the volunteer, 
multistakeholder model to continue? Is it based on ICANN capacity or 
stakeholder capacity?

Best,
Kathy

On 2/26/2016 6:10 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to meet the Board,
> talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
>
> The Board would, however, like to know in advance what we're going
> to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
>
> If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with the Board in
> Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel free to post
> to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
>
> Thank you,
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2