NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:26:17 -0400
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Technicalities
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Hi,

The point was that the Board is responsible for making sure the advice
it accepts is consistent with the bylaws.  GAC does not accept that
responsibility.  Then again, I know of no other ACSO that is making that
decsion of whether their recommendations or advice are consistent with
the bylaws..  It is up to the Board, and the the IRP to decide whether
something is consistent with the bylaws.  That is their job.

As for whether it is a bad as it looks to you, probably not.

avri


On 03-Aug-15 19:00, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
> Robin and other fellow NCSG-ers:
>
>  
>
> Regarding human rights, I have been going through the CCWG report and
> found something very disturbing.
>
>  
>
> On page 33, which is part of the section on “Principles” I noticed a
> big loophole opening up in the attempt to constrain ICANN’s actions by
> defining a limited mission. Paragraph 224 has been modified in a way
> that makes it LESS restrictive than before. It says that ICANN must
> take into account advice of governments, and the former language about
> how the advice must be consistent with its bylaws and its fundamental
> commitments and core values has been struck out.
>
>  
>
> Can anyone who was in Paris tell me how this happened and whether it
> really is as bad as it looks?
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf
> Of *Robin Gross
> *Sent:* Monday, August 3, 2015 5:06 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* [NCSG-Discuss] CCWG Accountability Report is Now Out
>
>  
>
> The CCWG-Accountability report is out:
>
>   http://bit.ly/1IUzwJB <http://t.co/5nYZyX5nII>
>
>  
>
> One important and positive recommendation is the report is that ICANN
> include a commitment to human rights in its bylaws.  But there's a lot
> of other significant changes in there, so please read the report.
>
>  
>
> NCSG will have a webinar on 5 August to go over this report and have
> any discussion on it participants want.
>
>  
>
> The comment period is now for 40 days.
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Robin
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2