Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2016 11:44:00 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi David
> On May 26, 2016, at 02:29, David Post <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I see Brett's suggestion as a perfectly reasonable way to achieve at least a degree of certainty about how it will actually operate, in practice.
Respect your views on the outstanding issues, but am still concerned about the larger political consequences. So I have a couple simple questions, if the transition is delayed as you suggest:
1. If Hillary somehow manages to get elected, when do you expect the further process you want would be completed and the political ducks would be lined up in DC for the US to finally relinquish its role?
2. If Hillary somehow manages to lose to Il Donald, in what decade do you expect the US would relinquish its role?
3. What do you think the “rest of the world” governments that have been screaming about the imperative to end the US role being the number one Internet issue on the global agenda will be doing in the meanwhile as we go through the many cycles of community tweaking and US politics involved?
Thanks
Bill
|
|
|