I think this is a very weird use of the IETF slogan. The code (IANA
functions) is running, and was running, and will be running. That is why
the CSG proposal was easier than the CCWG proposal.


On 05/25/2016 04:40 PM, David Post wrote:
> But the other hals of the old IETF equation is critical, too:  "Running
> Code."  Having arrived at consensus is no guarantee that the system will
> actually work as planned.  Nobody knows if this code will run smoothly
> or not, and it seems perfectly sensible to say we should find that out
> before we adopt it.  Of course, delay has costs - but it has the very
> significant advantage that it is not irrevocable.

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9