NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Mar 2017 19:09:05 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
Hi Kathy,

Yes, that's right. I think we should come up with about three questions,
there won't be time for more.

Tapani

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:55:52AM -0500, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> Tapani,
> 
> These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right?   I think we should
> be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our efforts to seek
> fairer compliance actions for registrants, compliance actions that fall
> within the scope of ICANN, and compliance actions responsive to the needs of
> the whole community (not a subset).
> 
> This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain provide
> it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about compliance. Would anyone
> else like to help craft a question for the board? (Please respond
> privately.)
> 
> Best, Kathy
> 
> On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking
> > Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you.
> > 
> > So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather
> > impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by
> > the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated.
> > 
> > Tapani
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> > 
> > > NCUC members,
> > > 
> > > Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with the
> > > stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG):
> > > 
> > > 1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in
> > > CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2?  What could the Board or ICANN
> > > organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of this
> > > work?
> > > 2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board meeting.
> > > 
> > > This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty to
> > > ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG about
> > > these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer our
> > > input to that thread.
> > > 
> > > Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our
> > > questions!
> > > 
> > > Best
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Farzaneh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2