NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dina Solveig Jalkanen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 26 Jan 2019 20:09:34 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (103 lines)
Count me in. Thomas

On 26.1.2019 17.08, Farell FOLLY wrote:
> I hope not to be alone this time :D and that experienced members on
> this topic would like to join as well, so that we can write a more
> substantial comment than last time, if the PC worths it.
>
> @__f_f__
>
> Best Regards
> ____________________________________
>
> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
> NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
> linkedin.com/in/farellf <http://linkedin.com/in/farellf> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 25 Jan 2019, at 23:29, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Farell,
>>
>> thanks for volunteering, you are in. you are first to volunteer.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> Le sam. 26 janv. 2019 à 05:12, Farell FOLLY <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> a écrit :
>>
>>     Hello Rafik,
>>
>>     I would like to get involved and contribute to this.
>>
>>     Who else join(ed) the crew?
>>
>>     @__f_f__
>>
>>     Best Regards
>>     ____________________________________
>>
>>     (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
>>     NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
>>     linkedin.com/in/farellf <http://linkedin.com/in/farellf> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>     On 18 Jan 2019, at 02:24, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]
>>>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi all,
>>>
>>>     ICANN just published today the public consultation on the
>>>     Initial Report on CSC Effectiveness. The Customer Standing
>>>     Committee is an important outcome of the IANA stewardship
>>>     transition. The CSC has been active for some time (since 2016)
>>>     and you may recall the monthly reports from CSC shared in the
>>>     list. It has been subject to review and the report is the
>>>     outcome of that process. NCSG has indirectly representation
>>>     there through the non-registry GNSO representative to CSC. For
>>>     more background and details, you can find all the relevant
>>>     material
>>>     here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/csc-effectiveness-initial-2019-01-16-en  
>>>
>>>     I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and
>>>     accessible to
>>>     all: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRbrBd0uBrn41IXFwo03FdNLjJHqzIPb3KVYqU7nvsg/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>     Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in
>>>     drafting the NCSG comment and join a drafting team. This can be
>>>     a good opportunity for those interested on review process or to
>>>     know more about the structure around the  IANA naming functions.
>>>     Those involved on IANA stewardship transition discussion can be
>>>     used as resources.
>>>
>>>     You can find current public comments (for 2019)
>>>     here https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2019 and
>>>     those submitted by NCSG here
>>>     https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2018 and
>>>     listing those who drafted them. Thanks again for those who
>>>     participating in drafting of the previous comments. 
>>>
>>>     Best Regards,
>>>
>>>     Rafik Dammak
>>>
>>>     NCSG Policy Committee Chair 
>>
>
-- 
***
Thomas, friendly geek in Amsterdam Chaos
https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant

ATOM RSS1 RSS2