NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:26:28 +0300
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hi Ed,

Executive Committee meetings have always been officially closed, but
all interested NCSG members have been and will be welcome nonetheless.
I'm not sure it'd be a good idea to invite CSG and other outsiders
there as well, but I'm open to persuasion there.

To the extent it's up to me I'd apply same rule for the other two
meetings, but there we'll have to get other participants to agree.
I'll make an effort to make it happen.

For local participants space may also be a concern, some of these may
have been allocated small rooms.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:31:05AM +0100, Edward Morris ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

> I note in the NCSG EC archive that remote participation details are listed for three NCSG meetings which are said to be closed ( http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/ec-ncsg/2016-October/001211.html ).
> 
> The NCSG has always fought for openness and transparency at ICANN. Might I inquire as to why these three meetings are closed and request that efforts be made to open the meetings. 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Ed

ATOM RSS1 RSS2