NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:00:52 +0200
Reply-To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
On 25-08-17 17:44, Stephanie Perrin wrote:

> Progress in the working group is slow. 

Indeed. But it is interesting to note that while most WGs
are suffering from lack of volunteers, this one seems
very popular - and people were very much obsessed by the
conflict of interest issues (as in wondering if they were
affected by them or not).

> I am not sympathetic to that request, I think it is a
> bad and unethical accounting practice to treat these funds as a kind of
> slush fund.

I agree.

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2