NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:29:15 +0200
Reply-To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
James,

> My personal opinion is A: One Mechanism and C: A new foundation structure.

C is pretty much off the table - not enough support. What is your
rationale for going for A instead of B? A seems to offer the least
amount of external oversight, and it is interesting that ALAC has
switched to supporting A (along with GAC).

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2