Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 Apr 2023 16:45:32 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The BC is arguing that lawyers/lobbyists/consultants who are
participating in PDPs and WG:s shouldn't have to disclose who
they are working for.
Their comment about us is "Interesting that the NCSG – which is a
vociferous proponent of privacy – is beating the drum for revealing
representation. They can’t have it both ways – protect identities when
they want and don’t when they find it convenient."
Julf
On 07/04/2023 15:52, Akinremi Peter Taiwo wrote:
> Is the BC arguing for personal data in SOI be redacted or SOI should not
> be disclosed.
>
> I don't really get why BC would be pushing for SOI not to be
> publicly available as that can have a negative impact in policy making
> considering the ICANN mission and its community nature.
>
> Privacy is not to hinder free flow of information but to ensure adequate
> processing, accountability and security. Should not be traded when there
> is possibility of influence in a community driven process or institution.
>
> We need to constantly put forward the purpose of SOI and its lawfulness.
>
> regards
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:05 AM Jean F. Quéralt
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Hi Julf.
>
> "and initiatives around the world that protects it."
>
> "laughable" >> disingenuous
>
> " and this is only possible when we know who is at the table
> influencing policy decisions."
> >>
>
> and this is only possible when we know, which no shadow of a
> doubt, which parties are sitting at the table influencing policy
> decisions.
>
>
> "they work together to"
> >>
> "they work hand in hand to"
>
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> Jean F. Queralt
> Founder & CEO - The IO Foundation <http://www.TheIOFoundation.org>
> Book a meeting <http://TIOF.Click/BookJFQ> (30 minutes)
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 13:48, Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> We have put together a draft response on the GNSO
> Statement of Interest Task Force (SOI-TF). We need
> to submit our response by tomorrow (Friday 7 April).
> Please feel free to comment or add.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rmJPMhoTWEh37Ewh-ticj7WMgwcQQ7VMZkzIHLlbCVs/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rmJPMhoTWEh37Ewh-ticj7WMgwcQQ7VMZkzIHLlbCVs/edit>
>
> Please note that the BC has specifically mentioned us in
> their response, so we feel the need to address that.
>
> Julf
>
>
> /*DISCLAIMER*/
> /The content of this message, which may contain personal or
> sensitive data, is confidential. If you have received it by mistake,
> please inform the sender by replying to the email and then
> permanently delete the message, including any attachments. It is
> forbidden to copy, forward or in any way reveal the content of this
> message to anyone. The integrity and security of this email cannot
> be guaranteed over the Internet and, therefore, the sender will not
> be held liable for any damage caused by the message./
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
> ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
> ------ ------- ------ ------
> *Policy Advisory | Data Governance and Privacy Consultant | Information
> Security & Cybersecurity | Certified Salesforce Administrator*
> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
> *Email:* [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>,
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> ___________________________________________
|
|
|