Hi all,
I was indeed asking what makes you stand out, or as Martin put it: what
makes you different from other councilors.
We will need to choose, so perhaps can you help us make it a bit easier
by helping us understand what the difference is among you.
Best,
Niels
On 08/25/2017 06:49 PM, Tatiana Tropina wrote:
> Niels and all,
> I agree with Martin on this. I had some troubles understanding your
> question. There are plenty of things that make us all unique but at the
> end it's shared values that bring us here at NCSG.
> I would also have to make up the response to your question as I have to
> have a deep knowledge of other candidates to claim my uniqueness.
> Warm regards,
> Tatiana
>
> On Fri 25. Aug 2017 at 15:34, Martin Pablo Silva Valent
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Niels,
> If you are talking about what makes my position on public safety
> unique, I would have to know more in deep other's positions. I’m
> guessing if we all dig enough we are going to find different points
> of view, but since we all share a common intuition is hard to guess
> my uniqueness from them. I would have to force or guess a difference.
> Or you were asking: ¿what makes us different from other councilors?
>
> Cheers,
> Martín
>
>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Niels,
>>
>> I consider my positions on the issues at the core of what the NCSG
>> advocates for – supporting a Domain Name System that is
>> innovative, protects the global public sphere, and is reliable –
>> to be normative and consistent with the positions that the NCSG
>> and its constituencies have taken since inception. To the best of
>> my knowledge I have not taken any positions which are
>> fundamentally inconsistent with the NCSG's principles or mission.
>>
>> However, outside of our core activities, there is one area where
>> it is possible my views diverge from some other members. I tend to
>> see things in transactional terms, so my position on the value of
>> some ICANN-funded programmes could be influenced by what return on
>> investment I see being generated. I would find it difficult to
>> continue supporting a programme where I thought metrics were
>> either lacking or revealing no justifiable return. Now whether, as
>> a GNSO Councillor, I would have any involvement in determining the
>> future of such programmes, is quite another question.
>>
>> I hope this answers your question, Niels. As always, I am happy to
>> expand upon my remarks or to answer any other questions.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>>
>> Ayden Férdeline
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 5:40 pm, Niels ten Oever
>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> wrote:
>>> Thank you very much candidates for your statements! All very
>>> eloquent and spot on at the same time. The fact that the opinions
>>> are also converging gives a lot of trust in this team. This do
>>> beckons me to ask a follow-up question: Where is your position is
>>> most divergent from the other candidates? In other words: what
>>> makes you different? Not in terms of style, but in terms of
>>> content. Thanks again very much in advance to the candidates.
>>> Best, Niels On 08/23/2017 11:59 PM, Mike wrote: > Hi, > > I'm
>>> just traveling at the moment, and without access to my laptop, so
>>> I'll just give some quick thoughts. > > I think that public
>>> safety is best guaranteed through a robust and reliable global
>>> DNS, including reliable expectations of privacy, security, etc.
>>> It always chaffs me a bit when people talk about the traditional
>>> trade-offs between privacy and public safety, as that ignores the
>>> enormous overlap between the two, and the fact that technologies
>>> which guarantee personal privacy are also vital to our collective
>>> security - guaranteeing a free press, secure financial
>>> transactions, etc. > > Bringing this back to ICANN, I would be
>>> very uncomfortable with any sort of cooperative relationship
>>> between ICANN and law enforcement or security agencies, beyond an
>>> educational role in sharing info about what ICANN is about, or
>>> something like that. ICANN should do only what it is legally
>>> compelled to do, and even that should be carried out with maximum
>>> transparency, and with appropriate resistance (appeals) if
>>> confronted with overbroad or unreasonable demands. > > TL/DR Come
>>> back with a warrant. > > Michael Karanicolas > > > Sent from my
>>> iPhone > >> On Aug 21, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Niels ten Oever __wrote:
>>> >> >> Dear candidates, >> >> Would you be so kind to tell us what
>>> you think ICANN's role is vis a vis >> public safety? >> >>
>>> Thanks in advance, >> >> Niels >> -- >> Niels ten Oever >> Head
>>> of Digital >> >> Article 19 >> www.article19.org
>>> <http://www.article19.org> >> >> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4
>>> A431 56C4 >> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 -- Niels ten Oever Head of
>>> Digital Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 __
>
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
|
