Great question, Kathy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Kathy Kleiman
> Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 2:57 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Questions to the Board in ICANN60
>
> Tapani, I've got one more:
>
> Why should the Consumer Safeguards Director be asking the Community
> what he should be doing when the bounds and boundaries of ICANN's scope
> and mission are clear (e.g., not content)? What happens when this
> conversation, because it is taking place in so many different corners of
> ICANN, does not have the Noncommercial Stakeholder Groups voice and
> concerns at one meeting, e.g., one webinar. Is this noncommercial voice now
> waived and these concerns buried or lost?
>
> All, please free to edit and expand!
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
> On 10/2/2017 12:31 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > Absent other suggestions I'm going to send Ayden's and Raoul's
> > questions to the Board. I've rephrased and abbreviated them somewhat
> > (intent being they should fit on the screen at once). Feel free to
> > comment, or even still suggest alternative questions, but please be
> > quick - deadline being over I intend to send these tomorrow.
> >
> >
> > (1) After the harassment incident in Hyderabad ICANN has adopted new
> > Standards of Behaviour and new community anti-harassment policy.
> >
> > How satisfied is the board are with the effectiveness of these
> > measures, particularly in those instances where complaints have been
> > filed with the Office of the Ombudsman and how is the Board monitoring
> > the performance of the Office of the Ombudsman to ensure that
> > harassment complaints filed are being appropriately handled?
> >
> >
> > (2) For historical reasons that no longer matter, constituencies
> > within Commercial Stakeholder Group appoint a total of four members to
> > the Nominating Committee (Business Community two, others one each),
> > whereas in Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group only NCUC appoints one,
> > NPOC none. Consequently there are four CSG appointees and only one
> > NCSG appointee in the NomCom.
> >
> > Could the Board to something to redress this long-standing problem and
> > how soon could we hope it to happen?
> >
> >
|
