NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 May 2017 19:57:32 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
And I will continue to say that ICANN has an obligation to ensure registries are run in a secure and stable manner, which running on a 486 does not make, not even if it was a DX =)



-----Original Message-----

From: Jeremy Malcolm [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 

Sent: 24 May 2017 17:56

To: James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Comment on GNSO Community Comment 2 (CC2) on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures / Consultation and review



On 24/5/17 12:24 am, James Gannon wrote:

> I think the point is that if an applicant cannot raise the application 

> fee, it will near impossible for them to raise the capital needed to 

> run a registry,



I had a registry for .org.au running on a 486 PC, though it never went live.  This was when Australia was taking tenders for the .org.au registry back in the day—but Chris Disspain was in charge, so the corporate schmoozers ended up with the contract, rather than my scrappy non-profit applicant.  We could easily have handled it, though.  Running a registry can be amazingly cheap, if you subtract all of the unnecessary administrative overhead that ICANN demands.



--

Jeremy Malcolm

Senior Global Policy Analyst

Electronic Frontier Foundation

https://eff.org

[log in to unmask]



Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161



:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::



Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt

PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122






ATOM RSS1 RSS2