Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:30:34 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi, Bruna,
> Since the mechanism C is pretty much off the table, would there be space
> for the implementation of Mechanism A with some level of community
> oversight - apart from the oversight we already do -? Im thinking that,
> maybe, such oversight can be implemented through the empowered community
> or a clearer mandate of this yet to be created internal department
> stating that it would need to take into consideration community advice
> in a more enforced way...
As James indicated, oversight mechanisms have been discussed
extensively, and will be part of whatever model will be selected.
> Also, I am a bit behind on this discussion, but I am also understanding
> that mechanism B is not entirely this community oversight im referring
> to, but more on the grounds of an external auditor, is that correct ?
In mechanism B, there would be both internal and external oversight. In
mechanism A, it would only be ICANN internal.
Julf
|
|
|