NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:40:52 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Thank you very much candidates for your statements! All very eloquent
and spot on at the same time. The fact that the opinions are also
converging gives a lot of trust in this team.

This do beckons me to ask a follow-up question:

Where is your position is most divergent from the other candidates? In
other words: what makes you different? Not in terms of style, but in
terms of content.

Thanks again very much in advance to the candidates.

Best,

Niels



On 08/23/2017 11:59 PM, Mike wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm just traveling at the moment, and without access to my laptop, so I'll just give some quick thoughts. 
> 
> I think that public safety is best guaranteed through a robust and reliable global DNS, including reliable expectations of privacy, security, etc. It always chaffs me a bit when people talk about the traditional trade-offs between privacy and public safety, as that ignores the enormous overlap between the two, and the fact that technologies which guarantee personal privacy are also vital to our collective security - guaranteeing a free press, secure financial transactions, etc.
> 
> Bringing this back to ICANN, I would be very uncomfortable with any sort of cooperative relationship between ICANN and law enforcement or security agencies, beyond an educational role in sharing info about what ICANN is about, or something like that. ICANN should do only what it is legally compelled to do, and even that should be carried out with maximum transparency, and with appropriate resistance (appeals) if confronted with overbroad or unreasonable demands.
> 
> TL/DR Come back with a warrant.
> 
> Michael Karanicolas
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Aug 21, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear candidates,
>>
>> Would you be so kind to tell us what you think ICANN's role is vis a vis
>> public safety?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Niels
>> -- 
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                     678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                     678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

ATOM RSS1 RSS2