Hi,
FYI, I have seen both ASO selected and non-ASO selected Board Members
at each of the RIR meetings (4) I have attended this past year.
So this is something that already happens.
--
Cheers,
McTim
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Arsène Tungali <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Great point Renata on the Board meeting with regions.
>
> I have always wondered why the ICANN Board cannot take time to send
> representatives at RIR meetings? Why can't they plan on attending at least
> one of the RIR's annual meetings per region in order to be close to the
> numbering community as well?
>
> This might not be appropriate here or might not be to the NCSG to ask that
> question but would appreciate discussion over it as general question :)
>
> ------------------------
> *Arsène Tungali*
> Co-Founder & Executive Director, Rudi international,
> CEO, Smart Services Sarl, Mabingwa Forum
> Tel: +243 993810967
> GPG: 523644A0
> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>
> 2015 Mandela Washington Felllow (YALI) - ISOC Ambassador (IGF Brazil &
> Mexico) - AFRISIG 2016 - Blogger - ICANN Fellow (Los Angeles & Marrakech).
> AFRINIC Fellow (Mauritius) - IGFSA Member - Internet Governance - Internet
> Freedom.
>
> Check the 2016 State of Internet Freedom in DRC report (English) and
> (French)
>
> 2017-10-03 16:05 GMT+02:00 Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>> Great question, Kathy
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> > Of Kathy Kleiman
>> > Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 2:57 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: Questions to the Board in ICANN60
>> >
>> > Tapani, I've got one more:
>> >
>> > Why should the Consumer Safeguards Director be asking the Community
>> > what he should be doing when the bounds and boundaries of ICANN's scope
>> > and mission are clear (e.g., not content)? What happens when this
>> > conversation, because it is taking place in so many different corners of
>> > ICANN, does not have the Noncommercial Stakeholder Groups voice and
>> > concerns at one meeting, e.g., one webinar. Is this noncommercial voice
>> > now
>> > waived and these concerns buried or lost?
>> >
>> > All, please free to edit and expand!
>> >
>> > Best, Kathy
>> >
>> >
>> > On 10/2/2017 12:31 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> > > Absent other suggestions I'm going to send Ayden's and Raoul's
>> > > questions to the Board. I've rephrased and abbreviated them somewhat
>> > > (intent being they should fit on the screen at once). Feel free to
>> > > comment, or even still suggest alternative questions, but please be
>> > > quick - deadline being over I intend to send these tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > (1) After the harassment incident in Hyderabad ICANN has adopted new
>> > > Standards of Behaviour and new community anti-harassment policy.
>> > >
>> > > How satisfied is the board are with the effectiveness of these
>> > > measures, particularly in those instances where complaints have been
>> > > filed with the Office of the Ombudsman and how is the Board monitoring
>> > > the performance of the Office of the Ombudsman to ensure that
>> > > harassment complaints filed are being appropriately handled?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > (2) For historical reasons that no longer matter, constituencies
>> > > within Commercial Stakeholder Group appoint a total of four members to
>> > > the Nominating Committee (Business Community two, others one each),
>> > > whereas in Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group only NCUC appoints one,
>> > > NPOC none. Consequently there are four CSG appointees and only one
>> > > NCSG appointee in the NomCom.
>> > >
>> > > Could the Board to something to redress this long-standing problem and
>> > > how soon could we hope it to happen?
>> > >
>> > >
>
>
|
