My best guess is we are all in agreement. The transparency seems to be hyped up. As I would say we have seen the different mails. 

Let’s keep an eye but not get emotional yet. There is yet a bit of explanation that has not yet happened. So my personal opinion is wait a bit and see but if goes under the carpet at length then Icann.org becomes more liable to answer questions. 

Kris

> On 22 Oct 2017, at 19:18, Enrique Chaparro <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Thankyou, Ayden.
> The issue of directors or officers being paid through private
> companies they own is thorny, to say the least, not only in
> ICANN but also but also in many other non-for-profit
> organizations. I'm personally against this practice, which is
> frequently employed as a resource for tax avoidance. In any
> case, any director or official that simultaneously has decison
> powers in private sector companies should have the burden
> of proof with regard to conflicts of interest.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Enrique