ICANN Studienkreis is August 25 - 26 in Stockholm.
EURODIG in Tallin is June 7 - 8,
ITU WSIS Forum is June 12 - 16 in Geneva
Wolfgang
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: NCSG-Discuss im Auftrag von Milan, Stefania
Gesendet: Di 29.11.2016 09:06
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCPH Intersessional timing
Was RightsCon mentioned already? March 29-31
________________________________________
Da: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> per conto di Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]>
Inviato: martedě 29 novembre 2016 08.24.23
A: [log in to unmask]
Oggetto: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing
Thank you Stephanie and Ines.
That makes it clear enough that February is our first choice.
As for the potential conflicts, I got nothing absolute (as in, "I will
definitely be going there") but a few potential ("may go") conflicts
for April/May:
Russian IGF, April 7-10
Internet 2: Global Summit, Washington DC April 23-26
IOT Forum, Madrid April 26
RIPE meeting, Budapest May 8-12
Some people also pointed out that Easter is in mid-April and would
in effect make 13-17 April inpractical.
Nobody has as yet offered any specific ICANN/IG events in August-September
timeframe, but the beginning of academic year impedes several people then.
If you have other potential conflicts in mind, please let me know ASAP.
Tapani
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 09:23:53PM -0500, hfaiedh ines ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> I vote February, sorry for missing the vote.
>
> 2016-11-28 17:53 GMT-05:00 Stephanie Perrin <
> [log in to unmask]>:
>
> > I apologise for not voting....no internet access. I vote February.
> > Stephanie
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.
> > Original Message
> > From: Tapani Tarvainen
> > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 2:43 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Reply To: Tapani Tarvainen
> > Subject: NCPH Intersessional timing
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Poll results from the intersessional timing options were, unfortunately
> > but not unexpectedly, not conclusive. The choices could have been better
> > phrased - some people emailed me offlist about that - but time was short.
> >
> > As it is, only 1 (can't make it) was clearly defined, the rest were
> > basically just a scale of preferability, and so averaging them out
> > makes at least some sense.
> >
> > Here's a summary of results, for each category and month averages
> > (excluding "no opinion" ones) and in parentheses the number of "can't
> > make it" choices:
> >
> > count category Feb Apr-May Aug-Sep
> > 4 Councillors 3.7(1) 2.7(1) 2.0(2)
> > 3 NCSG EC 3.7(1) 3.5(0) 2.0(0)
> > 1 NCSG PC 5.0(0) 2.0(0) 3.0(0)
> > 4 NCUC EC 4.8(0) 3.0(1) 3.5(0)
> > 2 NPOC EC 4.5(0) 3.5(0) 4.0(0)
> > 10 Other 3.3(2) 4.1(1) 3.7(2)
> >
> > 14 All except "Other" 4.2(2) 3.1(2) 3.4(2)
> > 24 All 3.9(4) 3.5(3) 3.5(4)
> >
> > My conclusion is that there's no really strong preference to any,
> > but February is slightly preferred (especially if we give less
> > weight to "Other" category, who are less likely to participate).
> >
> > A couple of people commented that the latter two choices, but
> > especially April/May, would depend a lot on the exact date:
> > there're lots of other meetings and events people will be
> > participating in that timeframe.
> >
> > The time should be decided tomorrow. Before that, we should try to
> > answer the questions posed by Tony Holmes below.
> >
> > For the first one I guess we can answer "no": none of the times impose
> > severe constraints for us, even though all of them are bad for at
> > least two council/EC members.
> >
> > For question 4 it's not clear-cut, but given the poll results
> > I'd suggest order would be (1) Feb (2) Aug-Sep (3) Apr-May
> > (the latter two decided by non-Other category).
> >
> > For questions 2 and 3 I'd like to ask you all what other
> > ICANN/IGF-related events you may be participating in the
> > timeframes given (to reduce clutter on the list you can
> > send them just to me and I'll summarize them here).
> >
> > Tapani
> >
> > ----- Forwarded message from tonyarholmes <[log in to unmask]>
> > -----
> >
> > Rob/All
> >
> > We agreed we will try and nail the date for the next intercessional during
> > a
> > 30 minute call next week.
> >
> > To try and avert what Klaus described as 'going around in circles', perhaps
> > the following approach could help narrow the options prior to that call.
> >
> > It appeared that the possibility of tagging an intercessional on to the
> > front or end of the Copenhagen or Johannesburg meetings was dismissed,
> > which
> > left us with 3 options on the table at the end of the call;
> >
> > - Week beginning February 13th
> >
> > - Late April/beginning of May
> >
> > - Beyond Johannesburg (effectively late Aug/early Sept)
> >
> >
> >
> > Suggest as representatives from our respective groups, in advance of the
> > call we try and respond to Rob on the following questions;
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Do any of those options impose severe constraints on the ability
> > of
> > your members to attend? If so, what are they and can they be overcome?
> >
> > 2. During the suggested time frame for late April/beginning of May
> > are
> > there major conflicts due to other Internet Governance, Regional, standards
> > bodies, trade association, other, meetings? If so what are they and when
> > will they take place?
> >
> > 3. Beyond Johannesburg, late Aug/early Sept, are there major
> > conflicts due to other Internet Governance, Regional, standards bodies,
> > trade association, other meetings? If so what are they and when will they
> > take place?
> >
> > 4. Can you rank the 3 options on the table in order of preference.
> >
> >
> >
> > If it proves possible to do this it may help focus thoughts during our 30
> > minute call. Just a suggestion.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> >
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
|
