NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 May 2019 21:09:04 +0200
Reply-To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Auction proceeds - second public comment period needed?
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
On 10-05-19 18:23, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> I would suggest strong support for a second public comment period.

Thanks, Sam! Any opinion on how long it should be? Of course,
the longer the more time for the community to formulate comments,
but the longer the delay before the CCWG finishes.

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2