Especially interesting is that SSAC thinks the subsequent procedures
PDP WG is proceeding too quickly.

	Julf

On 04/11/18 17:22, Farell FOLLY wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> During my participation at the ICANN63 as an alternate GNSO councillor,
> I have got the opportunity to attend an SSAC informational session that,
> I think, could be of interest. Please check the document in attach.
> Within, you will find interesting stuff about the SSAC impression on the
> new gTLDs subsequent procedures Working Group, its current work, and
> topics of Interest.
> 
> As a security expert, I am interested in what the SSAC does especially
> when it comes DNS security protocol and the security Internet of Things
> (planned and yet to come). As such, it would be a pleasure for me tos p
> share news about this AC, coach people who would like to know more and
> lead drafting teams during ssac-related public comments.
> 
> 
> 
> @__f_f__
> 
> Best Regards
> ____________________________________
> 
> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
> NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
> linkedin.com/in/farellf <http://linkedin.com/in/farellf> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>