James,

> So sorry to be clearer, I support sending one mechanism to the board. 

Thanks for the clarification! So even if it turns out the mechanism is
one we don't like, we don't want the board to have any choice?

> If C is off the table I would go with A as I think the collaboration
> model introduced too much complexity and admin overhead when it comes to
> reality, and I am of the opinion that it would bring additional risks to
> the disbursement of the funds within ICANN mission.

The danger with A is, as with so many ICANN things, capture (by ORG or
some part of the community).

	Julf