Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:21:08 +0300 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Carlos,
All those who responded to the check-in request should have
received a ballot.
I will look into your case and let you know what went
wrong in your case.
--
Tapani Tarvainen
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:16:17AM -0500, Carlos Vera ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
> Who should receive a ballot? If I receive this email, does it mean I should receive a ballot? If so I never receive one.
>
> If only some group should receive ballot then it seems not appropriate to send this email to the entire list.
>
> Regards
>
> Carlos Vera
>
> Enviado desde mi smartphone BlackBerry 10.
> Mensaje original
> De: Carlos Afonso
> Enviado: miércoles, 24 de agosto de 2016 10:59
> Para: [log in to unmask]
> Responder a: Carlos Afonso
> Asunto: Re: Missing ballots
>
> I have never received any ballot, be it version one or version two...
>
> --c.a.
>
> On 24/08/2016 02:27, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > If you have not received a ballot please contact me offlist.
> >
> > So far there have been three cases and all have been found
> > to have been technical problems and have been resolved.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
>
> --
>
> Carlos A. Afonso
> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário]
> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise]
>
> Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br
> CGI.br - http://cgi.br
> ISOC-BR - https://isoc.org.br
|
|
|