+1  David would be very good in this role.

avri


On 03-Sep-16 05:21, William Drake wrote:
> +1 from me as well, David would be great for this
>
> Bill
>
>
>> On Sep 3, 2016, at 10:59, Arsène Tungali <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to David.
>> As the IGC Co-coordinator and an NCSG member, i think you will be a
>> great addition to the NCSG group (where i am currently representing
>> my CS group).
>>
>> -----------------
>> Arsène Tungali,
>> @arsenebaguma
>> +243 993810967
>> GPG: 523644A0
>> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
>>
>> On Sep 3, 2016, at 6:37 AM, David Cake <[log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to express my interest in the CSCG representative
>>> position. 
>>>
>>> My name is David Cake, I’m a male resident of Australia. I’m a
>>> consultant and student, and I am the chair of Electronic Frontiers
>>> Australia. 
>>>
>>> I wish to serve on the CSCG as I think NCSGs relationship with other
>>> civil society groupings, and continued presence and voice in
>>> Internet governance activities outside ICANN, especially those that
>>> discuss the future of multi-stakeholder fora such as ICANN (which
>>> obviously we have significant experience with as a group that is not
>>> always shared by broader civil society) is valuable. I think CSCG
>>> has been a very useful initiative in coordinating representation of
>>> civil society within Internet governance, and helping rebuild
>>> working relationships within broader civil society, and want to see
>>> it continue to be successful. I think I am a reasonable candidate as
>>> I have familiarity with several groups within the broader civil
>>> society world, and will continue to be engaged in other Internet
>>> governance activities. 
>>>
>>> I feel I am qualified for this position as I head a civil society
>>> group that frequently collaborates with other groups on a wide range
>>> of internet governance issues, I have been a member of the IGC and
>>> Best Bits communities for several years including attending meetings
>>> at several Internet Governance Forums, and serving on an IGC NomCom,
>>> and I am aware of the issues and dynamics of broader civil society.
>>> I also have been an active member of NCUC and NCSG (including being
>>> acting chair of NCUC, and two terms as an NCSG GNSO councillor) for
>>> several years, feel I have good working relationships with many
>>> within NCSG, and feel I can represent the broad range of NCSG
>>> interests well. I also  believe I have an excellent working
>>> relationship with Robin Gross, the current (and overlapping for
>>> first year) person in this role. 
>>>
>>> I do not anticipate I will have problems finding the time to fulfil
>>> the role - if nothing else, I will no longer be a GNSO councillor, a
>>> considerably more time consuming NCSG role that I have occupied for
>>> the last 4 years. 
>>>
>>> I’d like to add that I do not think my putting myself forward for
>>> this role should preclude anyone else from nominating - there are
>>> several others within NCSG I feel would do an excellent job at this
>>> role if they wished. 
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>> On 2 Sep 2016, at 5:53 PM, Marilia Maciel <[log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear members of NCSG,
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Our stakeholder group needs to select representatives for two
>>>> positions: 
>>>>
>>>> 1. One representative at the Civil Society Coordination Group (CSCG)
>>>>
>>>> 2. Two members (primary and alternate) to the GNSO Review Working Group
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> This is call for volunteers who would be willing to serve on these
>>>> positions. Statements of Interest should be sent to the NCSG list
>>>> until the *_4th of September 23:59 UTC_*. Please on the subject
>>>> line: "SOI [your name] CSCG" or "SOI [your name] GNSO review".
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The selection process will be conducted by the members of the NCSG
>>>> Policy Committee by means of finding rough consensus. The criteria
>>>> that will be used to evaluate the candidates is explained in each
>>>> of the sections below. 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> * CSCG - MEMBER REPRESENTATIVES*
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> For more info about the job of the CSCG, please do refer to their
>>>> website <http://internetgov-cs.org/>.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The new CSCG Rep will serve for a period of 2 years starting
>>>> September 2016 (to September 2018) and I will be stepping down from
>>>> this role next year (in September 2017) after we have elected a new
>>>> Co-coordinator in replacement of Analia (whose term expires in
>>>> January 2017).
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Description: 
>>>>
>>>> This position will not always require much of your time though it
>>>> can happen during Nomcoms or working groups. So we need someone who
>>>> knows a lot about IGF, MAG selection process and
>>>> understands civil society in the IG area as a whole. We need
>>>> someone who has been active on the IGC for quite a while and who
>>>> can speak our positions.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Role of Representatives:
>>>>
>>>> The duties of members are to:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Consider the interests of civil society as a whole,
>>>>
>>>> 2. Serve on Nomcoms regularly as required,
>>>>
>>>> 3. Communicate with their coalitions on CSCG developments.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The Statement of Interest (SOI) will have this info:
>>>>
>>>> • Name, declared region of residence, gender and employment
>>>>
>>>> • Reasons for willingness to take on this task (max 200 words)
>>>>
>>>> • Qualifications for this position (max 200 words)
>>>>
>>>> • Statement of availability for the time the position requires (max
>>>> 200 words)
>>>>
>>>> • The nominee’s statement may also include any other information
>>>> the candidate believes in relevant (max 200 words).
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> *MEMBERS IN GNSO REVIEW WORKING GROUP*
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> /In Brief/
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council adopted
>>>> the Charter
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf> of
>>>> the GNSO Review Working Group during its meeting on 21 July 2016.
>>>> This Working Group is tasked to develop an implementation plan for
>>>> the GNSO Review recommendations
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf> which
>>>> were recently adopted
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-06-25-en#2.e> by
>>>> the ICANN Board. This is the Call for Volunteers to join this
>>>> Working Group. Anyone interested in the GNSO Review and
>>>> contributing to the development of the implementation plan and
>>>> subsequent implementation is encouraged to volunteer.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> /What This Working Group Will Do/
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Per the GNSO Review Working Group Charter
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-review-charter-11jul16-en.pdf> the
>>>> GNSO Review Working Group will be responsible for developing an
>>>> implementation plan, containing a realistic timeline for the
>>>> implementation, definition of desired outcomes and a way to measure
>>>> current state as well as progress toward the desired outcome for
>>>> the GNSO Review recommendations adopted by the ICANN Board
>>>> (thirty-four (34) recommendations of the Final Report
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf> of
>>>> the Independent Examiner (i.e. all recommendations excluding
>>>> recommendations 23 and 32). This implementation plan is to be
>>>> submitted for approval to the GNSO Council, followed by
>>>> consideration by the ICANN Board. Following the approval of the
>>>> implementation plan, the Working Group is also expected to execute
>>>> and oversee the implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations
>>>> unless specified differently in the implementation plan.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The GNSO Review Working Group will also be responsible for
>>>> considering any new requests_^  _by the GNSO Council concerning
>>>> issues related to the GNSO Council processes and procedures and to
>>>> Working Group guidelines that have been identified either by the
>>>> GNSO Council, or a group chartered by the GNSO Council, as needing
>>>> discussion. However, the first priority of the Working Group will
>>>> be the development of an implementation plan and the subsequent
>>>> implementation of the GNSO Review recommendations. 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Timeline and Deliverables
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> The GNSO Review Working Group is expected to deliver the
>>>> implementation plan to the GNSO Council for consideration at the
>>>> GNSO Council meeting at ICANN57 at the latest in order to meet the
>>>> Board set objective of ‘an implementation plan, containing a
>>>> realistic timeline for the implementation, definition of desired
>>>> outcomes and a way to measure current state as well as progress
>>>> toward the desired outcome, shall be submitted to the Board as soon
>>>> as possible, but no later than six (6) months after the adoption of
>>>> this resolution’i.e., December 2016. 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> /How to Join/
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Each GNSO Stakeholder Group and/or Constituency will identify one
>>>> primary and one alternate member to serve on the GNSO Review
>>>> Working Group. In addition to these appointed members, anyone
>>>> interested will be able to join this working group as a participant
>>>> or observer.  Please note that participants are expected to attend
>>>> conference calls and to actively participate in online
>>>> discussions.  Observers can follow the group's work on the mailing
>>>> list but can neither send to the mailing list nor participate
>>>> actively in the calls.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> NCSG policy committee will conduct a selection of the primary and
>>>> alternate member to serve on the GNSO Review Working
>>>> Group. *Please, include in your statement of interest*:
>>>>
>>>> 1.    Knowledge or practical experience with GNSO’s policy
>>>> development process 
>>>>
>>>> 2.    Knowledge of GNSO’s operational procedures
>>>>
>>>> 3.   Previous experience in other GNSO working groups or in working
>>>> with other stakeholder groups.
>>>>
>>>> 4.   Comment on your time and availability to engage in GNSO review
>>>> working group.
>>>>
>>>> / /
>>>>
>>>> /Further information and preparation/
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> For those interested in volunteering for this effort, you are
>>>> encouraged to review the following materials:
>>>>
>>>> GNSO Review Recommendations
>>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/review-feasibility-prioritization-25feb16-en.pdf>
>>>>
>>>> Independent Examiner Final Report
>>>> <https://www.icann.org/zh/system/files/files/gnso-review-final-summary-15sep15-en.pdf>
>>>>
>>>> Frequently Asked Questions <https://community.icann.org/x/UBCbAw>
>>>>
>>>
>
> ************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> (direct), [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]> (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
> ************************************************
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus