 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:05:21 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The Whois Complaint process and why anonymous people can ask for
personal information about registrants, but ICANN never investigates
whether these allegations are intended to harass, intimidate or for
anti-competitive reasons.
On 10/19/2016 11:29 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> 1. The new "complaint" system, which puts ICANN's lawyer (whose job is to protect the corporation from complainers whether they are right or wrong) in charge of managing complaints. Also affects the independence of the Ombudsman in unclear ways
>
> 2. The "small group" that is trying to develop policy for IGO names outside of ICANN's bottom up and representative policy processes.
>
> 3. Why there were no repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot Registry case. Indeed, the person responsible seems to have been promoted.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Tapani Tarvainen
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:30 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As usual the board wants in advance topics or questions for our meeting with
>> them in Hyderabad.
>>
>> Suggestions?
>>
>> --
>> Tapani Tarvainen
|
|
|
