Hi Farzaneh,

I went that through once more. I'm fine with it as is (with question 5
removed), although I added comments about two places where I felt it
could be made clearer.

Good work.

Tapani

On Sep 11 14:11, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> 
> we had quite a discussion about question 5 of this document.
> 
> <goog_1592657447>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vb4a7KnsDwqQlKCMkQx2y8DlykYkT2z3ODxMweGcxTE/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> I removed it as Raoul suggested but we do need to have the application
> guidelines in place soon, so that members and applicants want to know about
> the process of approval.
> 
> I had shared this document a month ago with the membership, but since
> issues have been raised, I recommend having a final look until 21 September
> and comment, we can resolve the comments and then we can send to NCSG EC
> for final approval.
> 
> 
> 
> Best
> Farzaneh