I'm not sure. To the best of my knowledge they do not engage in any polling to understand the views of ordinary Internet users.

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 08:51, Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I am curious - what mechanism does ALAC use to agree on the views/
> comments?
>
> Julf
>
> On 20-11-18 00:27, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Michael.
> > It is worth contrasting the Domain Name Rights Coalition's response with
> > some of the other submissions. The ALAC has taken a very different view
> > in their response
> > https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-rds-whois2-review-04sep18/attachments/20181118/956c991f/AL-ALAC-ST-1118-01-00-EN-0001.pdf,
> > which is largely supportive of the recommendations because, they note,
> > "The primary concern for ALAC in this review is the accuracy of
> > registrant data (WHOIS data) and its use by security and law enforcement
> > bodies in addressing the misuse and abuse of the DNS system."
> > One wonders why that is their priority.
> > Best wishes,
> > Ayden Férdeline
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 00:10, Michael Karanicolas
> > [log in to unmask] wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > Hope everyone is well. Just checking in to circulate these comments
> > > for the RDS/WHOIS 2 Review Team which were prepared by the Domain Name
> > > Rights Coalition http://dnrc.tech/ and submitted last week.
> > > There's are a lot of important conversations happening in that group,
> > > so thought these may be of interest. Comments and discussion welcome,
> > > of course.
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Michael Karanicolas