NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Renata Aquino Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:31:31 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Hi

Sent this message too soon
Though we should also consult members and copied everyone

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Rafik, Poncelet
>
> GNSO SSC is going through a charter review
>
> I thought I hear your comments on the following poitns
>
> Two major review points
>
> - SSC currently works via unanimous consensus
> There was a suggestion to change this to majority
> So far, the SSC has been succesful in reaching consensus
> Chair and vice-chair suggested this be maintained
> I am not sure how to go here.
> We have had situations where it was a tough decision. I have held my
> position, for instance, that underrepresented candidate pool have
> different weighing - like women and underserved regions. This view is
> not always shared by other SSC members, despite it being on charter
> that we also have to observe diversty.
> What do you think of this?
>
> - Announcement of deliberation results
> The announcement of SSC deliberation results currently is made public
> before it is presented to GSNO Council to be confirmed.
> There was a suggestion that this announcement be delayed once GNSO
> Council confirms candidates.
> This seems straightforward but what if we have a situation where SSC
> and GNSO Council do not concur?
> Will this difference be made public?
> Will SSC be consulted again?
>
> Thanks

ATOM RSS1 RSS2