Hi,
It is certainly a serious accusation that has been made, and while I don’t think corruption is the right word, I agree with Wisdom that what happened was distasteful and something we want to avoid happening again.
I think the EC was put in a difficult position here because of the actions of the former Chair, and so I greatly appreciate how the other members of the EC worked diligently to rectify the situation.
Thanks,
Ayden
> On 1 Sep 2018, at 03:08, Michael Karanicolas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Hi Wisdom,
>
> Those are very serious accusations to throw around, and I'd ask you to
> pause, and reflect before you do. There's been a lot of talk about
> civility over the past few days. I think the EC are very willing to be
> held accountable for our decisions and actions, and if you disagree
> with them you have every right to call us out - and to do so
> vigorously if you feel that's warranted. But please don't throw around
> words like "corruption" just because you don't like a decision.
>
> In terms of transparency, the entire conversation that led us to where
> we are now is on our public archives:
> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-August/thread.html#9906.
> I would encourage you to read the entire "announcing ICANN63 travel
> slot?" thread, to get a full understanding of how the previous
> announcement happened, why the EC objected, and why we felt the need
> to revisit it. In a nutshell, the previous announcement, which was
> made by the Chair, did not accurately represent the votes of the EC,
> and all five EC objected as soon as the announcement went out. Between
> the problems with the voting, and the realization that Benjamin was
> actually not eligible to receive the support according to NCUC rules,
> it was decided to extend the voting process, and give the EC an
> additional opportunity to vote for their preferred candidates. That
> discussion, and the vote that followed, also took place on list, and
> is free to view, at the link I provided above.
>
> I'm not going to claim that this process was perfect. I, myself, have
> serious issues with the way this all unfolded, as I expressed on the
> EC list. But fundamentally, we're all volunteers trying to do the best
> we can in the circumstances we are in and under the framework we
> operate under. Given the circumstances, we acted under our best
> judgment - which you are free to question, and we welcome constructive
> discussion on how we can do better.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:54 PM Wisdom Donkor <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I cant believe this, this cant be happening, How many days now the first announcement was made, for some one to turn around and announce a new list as potential travelers.
>> i disagree with the announcement of the new names. Please this is not a private institution where can be decided on anyhow.
>>
>> I am against the withdrawal of the first list, it doesnt order well for for NCUC. This kind of corrupt decisions and lack of transparency should be stopped.
>>
>> I am disappointed in the EC and everyone who took part in this corrupt decision. Is distasteful and lacks principles.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)
>> Africa Open Data and Internet Research Foundation (Co-Founder)
>> E-government, Internet Governance & Open Government Data and platforms Specialist
>> ICANN Fellow / UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member,
>> Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member,
>> OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Member.
>> National SDG's data Roadmaps Advisory Board Member, Ghana
>> National Secretariat Manager, IT Association of Ghana (ITAG)
>> Ghana Energy Data Task-force Member
>> Ghana OGP Advisory Committee Member
>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>> Skype: wisdom_dk
>> facebook: Kwasi Wisdom
>> Linkdin: Kwasi Wisdom
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 8:42 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>
>>> NCUC EC is reaching out in order to correct an recent travel funding and CROP Slot allocation that was announced on this list.
>>>
>>> As the EC was going through the applications for the PIR travel funding to ICANN63, the allocation turned out to be a tough decision given the quality of the applicants. And, as we were finishing the deliberation, there was a confusion about the final voting tallies and the deliberation being allegedly concluded when it was not.
>>>
>>> Also, the announcement implied on one of the NCUC CROP slots allocation. We decided to retract this one based on the fact that there was no open call for this slot (as per our Operating Procedures requirement) and believe it would not be fair to allocate the resource without the knowledge of our members about the possibility. Therefore, instead of what was announced on the lists in the beginning of the week, this announcement concerns the allocation of the two travel slots available as per the PIR Funding and no longer allocates one of NCUC's CROP slots.
>>>
>>>
>>> Due to the above mentioned mistakes, we retract the previously announced allocation and would like to inform that the PIR Funded travelers, as per NCUC EC deliberation are:
>>>
>>> - Shahul Hameed
>>>
>>> - Dina Thomas Covenant
>>>
>>> We apologize for the confusion and especially to those affected by the precocious announcement of the allocation. Congratulations to the selected travelers!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> --
>>> NCUC EC
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> [log in to unmask]
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
|
