NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:30:34 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi, Bruna,

> Since the mechanism C is pretty much off the table, would there be space
> for the implementation of Mechanism A with some level of community
> oversight - apart from the oversight we already do -? Im thinking that,
> maybe, such oversight can be implemented through the empowered community
> or a clearer mandate of this yet to be created internal department
> stating that it would need to take into consideration community advice
> in a more enforced way...

As James indicated, oversight mechanisms have been discussed
extensively, and will be part of whatever model will be selected.

> Also, I am a bit behind on this discussion, but I am also understanding
> that mechanism B is not entirely this community oversight im referring
> to, but more on the grounds of an external auditor, is that correct ? 

In mechanism B, there would be both internal and external oversight. In
mechanism A, it would only be ICANN internal.

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2