Hi Juan,
I gave it some thought as well.
Though GAC representatives could help with the issue locally, it needs
to be tied to Non Commercial interest in a form of question or request
that GAC can address or answer...
BR,
Thomas
/Jalkanen Dina Solveig
***
Rollover is scheduled for Oct 11 2018. "Plan to Restart the Root Key
Signing Key (KSK) Rollover Process" is up for public comment and I
understand NCUC will most likely submit one.
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ksk-rollover-restart-2018-02-01-en
"ICANN org is particularly interested in hearing additional community
ideas as to ways we might increase outreach to operators of validating
resolvers, so they will be ready for the rollover."
On 12.02.2018 18:51, Juan Manuel Rojas wrote:
> Dear all,
> I think that Kathy and Michael are good points to raise in GAC meeting.
> Maybe we also could add some topic related with root KSK rollover due
> that from my understanding its related with the DNS security,
> specifically DNSSEC and how this could affect us as organizations and
> Non-Commercial users.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P.
> Presidente - AGEIA DENSI Colombia
> Communications Committee Chair. Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns
> Constituency (NPOC) - ICANN
> Cluster Orinoco TIC member
> Master IT candidate, Universidad de los Andes
>
> Cel. +57 3017435600
> Twitter: @JmanuRojas <http://www.twitter.com/jmanurojas>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El lunes, 12 de febrero de 2018 11:39:56 a. m. GMT-5, Sam Lanfranco
> <[log in to unmask]> escribió:
>
>
> I want to underscore the central point in Julf's comments.
>
> The GAC is not a tight and informed coalition of representatives of
> national governments. It has some key players that send highly
> knowledgeable contingents (e.g. the European Community). However, many
> representatives are under-equipped either for knowledgeable engagement
> in GAC business (and much less ICANN's remit) or to knowledgeably
> represent the nuances of their country's positions on issues that are on
> the ICANN agenda.
>
> It is one thing to remain on guard against GAC's potential influence as
> a camel's nose under the edge of the ICANN multistakeholder tent. It is
> an additional concern to worry about the internal dynamic within GAC as
> it arrives at its advisory positions. /Virtually none of the individual
> GAC countries would tolerate such an internal dynamic within their own
> national policy discussions. /
>
> My own (possibly unpopular) view is that national civil society
> constituencies should dig into how their own governments select and
> inform their GAC representatives. Internet governance, and GAC's role in
> ICANN would be improved if that domestic engagement were promoted./How
> many of us know who is, or engage with, our government's GAC
> representative, or even which department of our government they come
> from? >>>> https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives
> <https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Representatives>/
>
> Sam L.
>
>
> On 2/12/2018 8:41 AM, Johan Helsingius wrote:
>> I really like Michael's suggestion:
>>
>>> Could we ask the representatives more generally about how they develop
>>> their policy positions, and whether and how they consult with human
>>> rights/privacy/data protection voices in government, or with domestic
>>> NGOs or civil society voices, in formulating the policy positions that
>>> they bring to ICANN - maybe phrasing the question a bit more broadly
>>> than just asking directly about the RPMs. I feel like this might need
>>> to be approached delicately, but it may be a good question to get the
>>> GAC delegates themselves to reconsider...
>> W§e have to remember that a lot of GAC members are fairly junior,
>> pretty new to ICANN, and not always very well briefed. They also
>> often biased to see GNSO as "A club of domain industry lobbyists with
>> a small group of free speech academics". I think it would be good to
>> point out that we speak on behalf of civil society in their countries
>> too, and encourage the GAC members, as representatives of their
>> governments, to extend the sphere of people they talk to and seek
>> advice from.
>>
>> Julf
>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------
> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
> in an unjust state" -Confucius
> 邦有道，贫且贱焉，耻也。邦无道，富且贵焉，耻也
> ------------------------------------------------
> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
> email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Skype: slanfranco
> blog: https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
>
--
* * *
Friendly geek in Amsterdam, happy FSFE and EFF member
https://wiki.techinc.nl/index.php/User:Thomascovenant
|
