Hi Tapani,

Thanks a lot for your answer! I hope you don't mind if I ask a follow-up question. It is not completely clear to me what the new membership management system change to the mailinglists?

From a transparency standpoint I think it would be really great if all lists and their archives were living in the same place, in the same format.

Best,

Niels


On 11/16/18 5:34 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> Hi Niels,
> 
> I don't remember what exactly I said in Abu Dhabi, but the plan has
> long been to migrate ncsg-discuss to the new membership management
> system as soon as it's ready. Unfortunately progress there has been
> rather slow, for which I must bear most of the blame, though it's now
> officially out of my hands.
> 
> Technically it would be easy enough to migrate ncsg-discuss to the
> same Mailman instances where most ncsg lists are (lists.ncsg.is),
> I have written tools for migrating archives from LISTSERV to Mailman,
> and perhaps I should have done that long ago, but I didn't want to end
> up moving the list twice. (That could still be done should current
> NCSG leadership so decide.)
> 
> Tapani
> 
> On Nov 16 15:04, Niels ten Oever ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A couple of meetings ago, namely in Abu Dhabi at ICANN60, Tapani said he was working on exporting the current NCSG list to a mailman instance, and way from the Syracuse University infrastructure. I wanted to check where we are in that process.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>> -- 
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Researcher and PhD Candidate
>> Datactive Research Group
>> University of Amsterdam
>>
>> PGP fingerprint	   2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488  
>>                    643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Researcher and PhD Candidate
Datactive Research Group
University of Amsterdam

PGP fingerprint	   2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488  
                   643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3