I am curious - what mechanism does ALAC use to agree on the views/
comments?

	Julf

On 20-11-18 00:27, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Thanks, Michael.
> 
> It is worth contrasting the Domain Name Rights Coalition's response with
> some of the other submissions. The ALAC has taken a very different view
> in their response
> <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-rds-whois2-review-04sep18/attachments/20181118/956c991f/AL-ALAC-ST-1118-01-00-EN-0001.pdf>,
> which is largely supportive of the recommendations because, they note,
> "The primary concern for ALAC in this review is the accuracy of
> registrant data (WHOIS data) and its use by security and law enforcement
> bodies in addressing the misuse and abuse of the DNS system."
> 
> One wonders why that is their priority.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Ayden Férdeline
> 
> 
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 00:10, Michael Karanicolas
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hope everyone is well. Just checking in to circulate these comments
>> for the RDS/WHOIS 2 Review Team which were prepared by the Domain Name
>> Rights Coalition <http://dnrc.tech/> and submitted last week. 
>>
>> There's are a lot of important conversations happening in that group,
>> so thought these may be of interest. Comments and discussion welcome,
>> of course.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Michael Karanicolas
>