NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Jan 2020 17:17:21 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
Dear Rafik and everyone,

I have exactly the same situation as Sam - happy to contribute
information and answer questions, but I don't think it would be
appropriate for me to be (formally) a part of the commenting team.

	Julf


On 03-01-2020 19:59, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Thanks Rafik,
> 
> As I stated earlier, I will help as a resource in the NCSG Comment of
> the Proposed Final Report of the New gTLD Proceeds ccWG but will only
> assist answering questions since I am relatively happy with the draft as
> it now stands, and it is against my principles to re-open any minor
> disagreements where I lost in the initial work. Below I have reproduced
> the three key specific questions the ccWG has asked about the draft
> Proposed Final Report, where individuals can comment on their own. There
> is also the call for comments on other issues as well.
> 
> Sam L.
> 
>  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17kMjYzoqWtG_JsRELzrmNpZii3BLmh6nZYyj27Jcm1g/edit#gid=427013893
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17kMjYzoqWtG_JsRELzrmNpZii3BLmh6nZYyj27Jcm1g/edit#gid=427013893>
> 
> Please provide your affiliation
> 
> 	
> 
> Are you providing input on behalf of another group (e.g., organization,
> company, government)?
> 
> 	
> 
> Question #1 for Public Comment: Do you support the CCWG’s recommendation
> in relation to the preferred mechanism(s)? If no, please provide your
> rationale for why not.
> 
> 	
> 
> Question #2 for Public Comment: Do you have any concerns about the
> updates the CCWG has made, as listed in Section 1 above, in response to
> the public comment forum? If yes, please specify what changes concern
> you and why?
> 
> 	
> 
> Question #3 for Public Comment: Is there any further information you
> think the CCWG should consider, that it hasn’t considered previously, in
> order to finalize its report for submission to the Chartering
> Organizations?
> 
> 	
> 
>  
> 
> 	
> 
> Are there any other comments or issues you would like to raise
> pertaining to the proposed Final Report? If yes, please enter your
> comments here. If applicable, please specify the section or page number
> in the proposed Final Report to which your comments refer.
> 
>  
> 
> 
>     ---- Original Message ----
>     *From*: Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
>     *To*: [log in to unmask]
>     *Sent*: Thu, Jan 2, 2020, 8:59 PM
>     *Subject*: [Reminder][Public Comments] Call for Volunteers for NCSG
>     Comment on Proposed Final Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds
>     Cross Community Working Group
> 
>     hi all,
> 
>     resending this reminder for volunteers who want to join Thato for
>     drafting the NCSG comments regarding the final report on auctions
>     proceeds.
> 
>     Best,
> 
>     Rafik
> 
>     Le mar. 24 déc. 2019 à 18:58, Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> a écrit :
> 
>         Hi all,
> 
>         ICANN published just by Christmas time a new public consultation
>         on Proposed Final Report of the New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross
>         Community Working Group. This working group was tasked to come
>         back with "framework to disburse the funds generated from
>         auctions of last resort in 2012 application round of the new
>         gTLD Program.". 
> 
>         We already gave our input
>         <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79429792/Initial%20Report%20of%20the%20New%20gTLD%20Auction%20Proceeds%20Cross-Community%20Working%20Group%20-%20NCSG%20comment.pdf?version=2&modificationDate=1546455158000&api=v2>
>         for the initial report and this time we need to review the final
>         recommendations and model suggested giving our input. For more
>         background and explanation you can find more info
>         here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-auction-proceeds-final-2019-12-23-en
> 
>         I created this google doc to be used during the drafting and
>         accessible to all in order to kick off the discussion and
>         comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eyGGPIFFMhVbEpIZQexgXkKO67fU33PZfv7G8HVY6_c/edit
> 
>         Please let me offline if you want to volunteer to participate in
>         drafting the NCSG comment and join the drafting team and work
>         with finance committee. 
> 
>         You can find previous public comments submitted by NCSG in this
>         wiki
>         page https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Public+Comments+-+2019 and
>         listing those who drafted them.  
> 
>         Taking this opportunity to wish you happy holidays and happy new
>         year!
> 
>         Best Regards,
> 
>         Rafik Dammak
> 
>         NCSG Policy Committee Chair 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2