LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms
From:	Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:29:15 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (11 lines)

James,

> My personal opinion is A: One Mechanism and C: A new foundation structure.

C is pretty much off the table - not enough support. What is your
rationale for going for A instead of B? A seems to offer the least
amount of external oversight, and it is interesting that ALAC has
switched to supporting A (along with GAC).

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU