LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Auction proceeds CCWG - Final Survey on Mechanisms
From:	Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:19:31 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (10 lines)

On 23-04-2020 11:06, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Yeah I dont like A much to be frank but if C is not available the hybrid
> model will be a disaster IMO, I dont think we will actually get more
> control in the hybrid scenario than in a department scenario.

We could just be stubborn and continue to support mechanism C and
wanting all 3 to be presented to the board.

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU