On Tue, 16 Apr 2019, Ayden Férdeline wrote:

> I have concerns around the migration to Zoom, not so much because of the interface (though I think it does not work as well as Adobe Connect when you have 100+ people in a room), but because this migration has occurred with no prior community consultation.
>
> I happen to find it very disrespectful that ICANN expects 3,000+ volunteers to spend their time downloading, installing, and learning how to use a new tool in order to save ICANN a few thousand dollars. Our time is worth something, surely?
>
> I also have deep concerns about this migration because many historical records are preserved only in the proprietary Adobe Connect format. Not every meeting gets transcribed. I sure do hope we do not lose access to these important records, as convenient as that might be for ICANN. I am assured by staff that no records will be lost but details on how they will be preserved are not forthcoming.
>
> Ayden Férdeline

Furthering what Ayden wrote, it is concerning that the switch announcement
reported that Zoom had known shortcomings and that ICANN has asked them to
correct these deficiencies.    You loose leverage when you've already
switched before these areas are taken care of, so the requested changes may
never appear.

-ron