LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Auction proceeds - second public comment period needed?
From:	Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 9 May 2019 16:04:26 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (10 lines)

One of the questions coming out of the CCWG Auction Proceeds
call this week is whether a second public comment period is
desirable, and if so, what the minimum duration for the comment
period should be. This is in light of the actions being taken
in response to the first comment period:

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138829/new%20gTLD%20AP%20CCWG%20Agreements%20-%20updated%2022%20April%202019.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1555965919000&api=v2

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU