NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 May 2019 14:59:49 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I tend not to be a fan of condensing public comment processes. I think the standard 45-day period is a good guide, and if that is to be shortened, there should be a very good reason for that to happen...

-- Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, May 10, 2019 9:09 PM, Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On 10-05-19 18:23, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
>
> > I would suggest strong support for a second public comment period.
>
> Thanks, Sam! Any opinion on how long it should be? Of course,
> the longer the more time for the community to formulate comments,
> but the longer the delay before the CCWG finishes.
>
> Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2