Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:00:21 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
You are correct, Bruna!
The ones I posted seem to have been from ICANN74.
Thanks for posting the correct ones.
Julf
On 17/02/2023 15:53, Bruna Martins dos Santos wrote:
> Heya, Julf, I'm not sure whether we had another meeting with the board
> since I left the chair position but the questions we asked at ICANN75
> were the following (a bit different than the ones you mentioned):
>
> PDPs Effectiveness and Volunteer fatigue
>
> 1.
>
> NCSG would like to discuss Board Approval, implementation by ICANN
> org and delays of several PDPs - something we have already discussed
> with you in previous occasions. If we look at processes such as the
> EPDP related ones I think we can find a good example due to the fact
> that even despite the fact that the board didn't yet approve phase 2
> recommendation, which were submitted in 2020, there is talk about
> the design paper of SSAD light. And in the past years, I guess we
> started gathering more examples of where the development process
> drags on for far too long and the implementation becomes the place
> de facto to redo policy recommendations.
>
> → So NCSG would like to request the board for comments about the current
> speed or even how do you plan to work together with GNSO and its groups
> on possible improvements to the PDPs timeline and so on.
>
> What efforts are channeled to keep the people in the community from
> volunteer fatigue?
>
> Whois Disclosure System
>
> 1.
>
> The recently published Whois Disclosure System design paper
> mentioned a risk that the system might not provide actionable data
> for use to answer questions raised by the SSAD ODA and this makes us
> a little concerned about the EPDP recommendations. The direction
> this work is going seems to point towards the intention to throw
> away the EPDP recommendations related to SSAD. I'll like to know
> what the board thinks about this concern.
>
> /
> /
>
> NomCom
>
> 1.
>
> NCSG has been talking for a long time about the lack of proper
> representation at the NomCom, the current state of things is that
> this part of the community only holds one seat at the group -
> currently held by NCUC - and we trust this configuration is not
> really representative of the diversity of stakeholders within GNSO
> or even proportional if we consider that other SGs hold more than
> just one seat. Therefore we have a very simple question: is there a
> possibility of rebalancing the NomCom?
>
>
> Extra one
>
> 1.
>
> We recently submitted a letter to the board with a CCWP-HR Human
> Rights Impact Assessment for ICANN’s System for Standardized
> Access/Disclosure (SSAD) and Operational Design Assessment (ODA)
> Recommendations. And in light of that we were wondering that the
> last ORG wide HRIA was done in 2019 so we have a few questions:
> what's the stake of recommendation implementation ? Is there going
> to be another one ? If so, when ?
>
>
> Best,
> Bruna
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:48 PM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Dear NCSG,
>
> It is time to decide what we want to take up in our meeting with the
> Board in Cancun. The Board has asked the SO/AC:s one question:
>
> "The ICANN Board would like to explore how to combine the efficiencies
> of an agile approach to problem solving, like the Council’s small
> teams,
> with the need for accountability and transparency, to make progress on
> policy conversations. When would such an approach be most appropriate
> and how can we ensure that it does not circumvent required steps in a
> policy development process?"
>
> What are our thoughts?
>
> As to our questions to the board, here are our questions from the
> previous meeting (as a reminder):
>
> - What is the Board’s take on the phenomenon of ICANN recycling veterans
> for leadership positions. Does the Board think it’s beneficial
> for the
> community to have the usual suspects rotating between leadership
> roles
> of different stakeholder groups? How do we fix this if we agree this
> is a problem? How does the Board imagine its role in assisting the
> community to recruit more new blood?
>
> - Is there a possibility of rebalancing the NomCom?
>
> - What efforts are channeled to keep the people in the community from
> volunteer fatigue?
>
> Julf
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-EC mailing list
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec>
>
>
>
> --
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
>
> German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander
> von Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
>
> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus <https://igcaucus.org/>
>
> Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype:
> bruna.martinsantos
> Email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|