You are correct, Bruna!

The ones I posted seem to have been from ICANN74.

Thanks for posting the correct ones.

	Julf


On 17/02/2023 15:53, Bruna Martins dos Santos wrote:
> Heya, Julf, I'm not sure whether we had another meeting with the board 
> since I left the chair position but the questions we asked at ICANN75 
> were the following (a bit different than the ones you mentioned):
> 
> PDPs Effectiveness and Volunteer fatigue
> 
>  1.
> 
>     NCSG would like to discuss Board Approval, implementation by ICANN
>     org and delays of several PDPs - something we have already discussed
>     with you in previous occasions. If we look at processes such as the
>     EPDP related ones I think we can find a good example due to the fact
>     that even despite the fact that the board didn't yet approve phase 2
>     recommendation, which were submitted in 2020, there is talk about
>     the design paper of SSAD light. And in the past years, I guess we
>     started gathering more examples of where the development process
>     drags on for far too long and the implementation becomes the place
>     de facto to redo policy recommendations.
> 
> → So NCSG would like to request the board for comments about the current 
> speed or even how do you plan to work together with GNSO and its groups 
> on possible improvements to the PDPs timeline and so on.
> 
>   What efforts are channeled to keep the people in the community from 
> volunteer fatigue?
> 
> Whois Disclosure System
> 
>  1.
> 
>     The recently published Whois Disclosure System design paper
>     mentioned a risk that the system might not provide actionable data
>     for use to answer questions raised by the SSAD ODA and this makes us
>     a little concerned about the EPDP recommendations. The direction
>     this work is going seems to point towards the intention to throw
>     away the EPDP recommendations related to SSAD. I'll like to know
>     what the board thinks about this concern.
> 
> /
> /
> 
> NomCom
> 
>  1.
> 
>     NCSG has been talking for a long time about the lack of proper
>     representation at the NomCom, the current state of things is that
>     this part of the community only holds one seat at the group -
>     currently held by NCUC - and we trust this configuration is not
>     really representative of the diversity of stakeholders within GNSO
>     or even proportional if we consider that other SGs hold more than
>     just one seat. Therefore we have a very simple question: is there a
>     possibility of rebalancing the NomCom?
> 
> 
> Extra one
> 
>  1.
> 
>     We recently submitted a letter to the board with a CCWP-HR  Human
>     Rights Impact Assessment for ICANN’s System for Standardized
>     Access/Disclosure (SSAD) and Operational Design Assessment (ODA)
>     Recommendations. And in light of that we were wondering that the
>     last ORG wide HRIA was done in 2019 so we have a few questions:
>     what's the stake of recommendation implementation ? Is there going
>     to be another one ? If so, when ?
> 
> 
> Best,
> Bruna
> 
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:48 PM Johan Helsingius via NCSG-EC 
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
>     Dear NCSG,
> 
>     It is time to decide what we want to take up in our meeting with the
>     Board in Cancun. The Board has asked the SO/AC:s one question:
> 
>     "The ICANN Board would like to explore how to combine the efficiencies
>     of an agile approach to problem solving, like the Council’s small
>     teams,
>     with the need for accountability and transparency, to make progress on
>     policy conversations. When would such an approach be most appropriate
>     and how can we ensure that it does not circumvent required steps in a
>     policy development process?"
> 
>     What are our thoughts?
> 
>     As to our questions to the board, here are our questions from the
>     previous meeting (as a reminder):
> 
>     - What is the Board’s take on the phenomenon of ICANN recycling veterans
>        for leadership positions. Does the Board think it’s beneficial
>     for the
>        community to have the usual suspects rotating between leadership
>     roles
>        of different stakeholder groups?  How do we fix this if we agree this
>        is a problem? How does the Board imagine its role in assisting the
>        community to recruit more new blood?
> 
>     - Is there a possibility of rebalancing the NomCom?
> 
>     - What efforts are channeled to keep the people in the community from
>         volunteer fatigue?
> 
>              Julf
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-EC mailing list
>     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec
>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-ec>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> */Bruna Martins dos Santos
> /*
> 
> German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander 
> von Humboldt Foundation <https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/>
> 
> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede <https://direitosnarede.org.br/>
> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus <https://igcaucus.org/>
> 
> Twitter: @boomartins <https://twitter.com/boomartins> // Skype: 
> bruna.martinsantos
> Email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>