Hi Raoul, One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then." Julf On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going to take > out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and shift the > decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO. > > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf> see pg. 4. > > The public comment is here: > https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023> > > It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this and > agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-) > > The public comment period closes on the 29th of May. > > -Raoul