NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Sat, 3 Jun 2023 10:15:00 +0200
Reply-To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
On 03/06/2023 08:56, Muhammad Shabbir Awan wrote:

> But the question is, why the detailed reports of community election results violating the secrecy of vote principle have been made public?

The results only contain the anonymized ballot IDs (used for
verification purposes), but it was still an administrative
error.

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2