NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Jun 2023 09:52:30 +0200
Reply-To:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
From:
Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
On 27/06/2023 23:14, dorothy g wrote:
> I believe this is an issue that  concerns both NCUC and NPOC and so an
> NCSG response is appropriate.

Yes, it does concern NCUC, NPOC and NCSG, and we should coordinate our
responses, but the question is directed separately to all 3
constituencies/groups, so we should have 3 separate (but aligned) responses.

	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2