NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Dec 2022 23:24:20 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Was there any feedback on the qualifications of our candidates?

David

> On 7 Dec 2022, at 10:50 pm, Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> On 07/12/2022 15:26, Peter Micek wrote:
>> Is there any chance to review?
> 
> Probably not. The issue has been raised with the PIR leadership, and
> the response is "we picked the most qualified candidates" and "There
> is no specific mandate for a NCSG representative".
> 
> We will continue the dialog, and hopefully meet with PIR leadership
> in Cancun.
> 
> 	Julf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2