The BC is arguing that lawyers/lobbyists/consultants who are
participating in PDPs and WG:s shouldn't have to disclose who
they are working for.

Their comment about us is "Interesting that the NCSG – which is a
  vociferous proponent of privacy – is beating the drum for revealing
  representation.  They can’t have it both ways – protect identities when
  they want and don’t when they find it convenient."

	Julf

On 07/04/2023 15:52, Akinremi Peter Taiwo wrote:
> Is the BC arguing for personal data in SOI be redacted or SOI should not 
> be disclosed.
> 
> I don't really get why BC would be pushing for SOI not to be 
> publicly available as that can have a negative impact in policy making 
> considering the ICANN mission and its community nature.
> 
> Privacy is not to hinder free flow of information but to ensure adequate 
> processing, accountability and security. Should not be traded when there 
> is possibility of influence in a community driven process or institution.
> 
> We need to constantly put forward the purpose of SOI and its lawfulness.
> 
> regards
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:05 AM Jean F. Quéralt 
> <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Julf.
> 
>     "and initiatives around the world that protects it."
> 
>     "laughable" >> disingenuous
> 
>     " and this is only possible when we know who is at the table
>     influencing policy decisions."
>     >> 
> 
>       and this is only possible when we know, which no shadow of a
>     doubt, which parties are sitting at the table influencing policy
>     decisions.
> 
> 
>     "they work together to"
>      >>
>     "they work hand in hand to"
> 
> 
>     My 2 cents.
> 
>     Jean F. Queralt
>     Founder & CEO - The IO Foundation <http://www.TheIOFoundation.org>
>     Book a meeting <http://TIOF.Click/BookJFQ> (30 minutes)
> 
> 
>     On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 at 13:48, Johan Helsingius <[log in to unmask]
>     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
>         We have put together a draft response on the GNSO
>         Statement of Interest Task Force (SOI-TF). We need
>         to submit our response by tomorrow (Friday 7 April).
>         Please feel free to comment or add.
> 
>         https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rmJPMhoTWEh37Ewh-ticj7WMgwcQQ7VMZkzIHLlbCVs/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rmJPMhoTWEh37Ewh-ticj7WMgwcQQ7VMZkzIHLlbCVs/edit>
> 
>         Please note that the BC has specifically mentioned us in
>         their response, so we feel the need to address that.
> 
>                  Julf
> 
> 
>     /*DISCLAIMER*/
>     /The content of this message, which may contain personal or
>     sensitive data, is confidential. If you have received it by mistake,
>     please inform the sender by replying to the email and then
>     permanently delete the message, including any attachments. It is
>     forbidden to copy, forward or in any way reveal the content of this
>     message to anyone. The integrity and security of this email cannot
>     be guaranteed over the Internet and, therefore, the sender will not
>     be held liable for any damage caused by the message./
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards
> 
> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
> ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ 
> ------ ------- ------ ------
> *Policy Advisory | Data Governance and Privacy Consultant | Information 
> Security & Cybersecurity | Certified Salesforce Administrator*
> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
> *Email:* [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>, 
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> ___________________________________________