Hi Raoul,

One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the
review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then."

	Julf


On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going to take 
> out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and shift the 
> decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.
> 
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf> see pg. 4.
> 
> The public comment is here: 
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023>
> 
> It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this and 
> agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)
> 
> The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.
> 
> -Raoul