Seems we missed more than one meeting. How many meetings were there in total, and how many did we miss? Julf On 29/05/2023 16:17, Raoul Plommer wrote: > I did voice my concerns when the review team was asking for input on > recommendation 10, we submitted our reasoning for getting another seat > and yeah, might've missed that one crucial meeting with GNSO but I > certainly thought our councillors knew our stance too and I think it > would be quite weird if they didn't echo out concerns we've been very > vocal about for the last .. ten years? > > The biggest reason for recommendation 10 was the imbalance between NCSG > and CSG and everyone knows our stance very well. Using a pretext of not > being in one particular meeting over the course of five years of the > RIWG and thus ignoring our concerns over the last ten years is pathetic > in my opinion. > > -Raoul > > On Mon, 29 May 2023, 04:37 Johan Helsingius, <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > Hi Raoul, > > One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the > review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then." > > Julf > > > On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going > to take > > out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and > shift the > > decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO. > > > > > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf>> see pg. 4. > > > > The public comment is here: > > > https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023>> > > > > It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this > and > > agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-) > > > > The public comment period closes on the 29th of May. > > > > -Raoul >
